1 MIN AGO: Keir Starmer CONFRONTS Uproar as Protesters Yell 'TRAITOR' Outside Dowing Street!

“You’re a liar, Starmer! You sold us out!”
“Traitor to Palestine! Traitor to Britain!”
“No more Tory Labour!”

These were just some of the cries erupting in the heart of Westminster this afternoon as hundreds — if not thousands — of furious protesters stormed the gates of Downing Street in a volatile show of rage directed squarely at Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer.

What was supposed to be a routine ministerial meeting inside Number 10 quickly spiralled into a security nightmare, as chants of “Traitor! Traitor!” drowned out the usual hum of Whitehall’s political theatre. Starmer, flanked by aides and close protection officers, refused to divert his route — opting instead to confront the noise head-on, in a move that is already dividing public opinion.

But the optics? Undeniably brutal.

The Scene: Protesters Flood Whitehall

It began around 11:47 AM, when crowds started to gather at Parliament Square, armed with banners, placards, megaphones, and righteous fury. Within the hour, that crowd had swelled to over 2,000 people, with police sources later estimating the final turnout at around 6,000 to 8,000.

Though Metropolitan Police initially referred to it as a “peaceful gathering”, that description barely held for long. As Starmer’s motorcade approached Downing Street shortly after 1:15 PM, the crowd erupted.

Chants Heard in the Crowd:

“Starmer Out! Starmer Out!”
“Gaza will never forgive you!”
“You lied to the working class!”
“Labour = Tories in red!”
“No Ceasefire, No Peace!”

Protesters spanned multiple causes — from pro-Palestinian activists and disillusioned Labour voters, to former Corbynites and grassroots trade unionists who say the Labour leader has abandoned core values in favour of corporate donors and Westminster centrism.

One woman in her 60s, draped in a Palestinian flag, told this reporter:

“I voted Labour my whole life. But I won’t vote for a man who stays silent while children are being bombed. Starmer has blood on his hands.”

Another protester, a young delivery driver from Hackney, said:

“It’s not just Gaza. It’s the NHS. It’s austerity. He promised to scrap tuition fees — now he’s backtracking like the rest of them.”

Tensions Escalate: Police Move In

As tensions soared, barricades were reinforced around the entrance to Downing Street. Officers from the Met’s Territorial Support Group (TSG) were deployed in riot gear — a visual that only inflamed protesters further.

Around 1:45 PM, a brief scuffle broke out after a group attempted to breach the first cordon. Officers pushed them back, and at least three arrests were made — including one man in his 30s who allegedly attempted to throw red paint toward the gates.

Inside Number 10, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak reportedly remained in briefing, but a source close to Downing Street said the situation was being “closely monitored.”

But then came the moment that would define the day.

The Walk: Starmer Doesn’t Flinch – or Does He?

At 2:07 PM, Keir Starmer emerged from a black government vehicle parked just meters from the gates. The crowd exploded.

Security detail urged him to re-route. He refused. In footage now circulating widely online, the Labour leader is seen pausing briefly, surveying the protest, then walking forward, head high — but eyes betraying visible tension.

A chant of “Traitor! Traitor!” built into a crescendo, with dozens of protesters surging forward, only to be blocked by police.

“We see you, Starmer! You’re no better than Blair!” someone screamed.

The moment has already sparked online debate: was this Starmer projecting strength, or was he simply cornered, unwilling to show weakness as his support base cracks beneath him?

Viral Moment: The Look of a Man Under Siege

Photos captured from press cameras show Starmer flanked by grim-faced aides, one of whom appears to be urging him to “keep moving.” His jaw clenched, fists at his sides, the Labour leader kept walking.

Social media had a field day.

@RedFlagRebel:
“Keir Starmer walking past 6,000 people calling him a traitor like he’s not the most hated man on the left. #LabourTraitor #StarmerOut”

@BlueWallBacker:
“I don’t like Starmer but credit where it’s due — man walked into a lion’s den and didn’t blink. Still not voting for him though.”

Eyewitness Reports: A Boiling Kettle of Rage

Speaking to protesters at the scene revealed a deep and emotional fracture between Labour’s leadership and the grassroots that once carried it.

A young Labour member from Birmingham said:

“This is not the party I joined. This is a sanitised, corporate shell of a movement that used to stand for the underdog. Starmer’s betrayal is personal for thousands of us.”

An NHS nurse from Kent said she took a day off to “stand here and remind Starmer he’s not untouchable.”

“He promised to defend the NHS. Now he’s mumbling about efficiency. He can’t even say the word ‘privatisation’.”

Downing Street’s Response: Silence, Then Spin

For over two hours, neither Downing Street nor Labour HQ issued an official response. At 4:16 PM, a terse statement from Labour spokesperson finally broke the silence:

“Sir Keir understands the strength of feeling expressed today. He remains committed to constructive dialogue and Labour’s long-standing values of justice, peace, and economic fairness.”

Critics were quick to pounce on the vagueness.

“What does that even mean? He walked past thousands of people screaming at him and said nothing. That’s not leadership — that’s cowardice,” said former Labour MP Laura Pidcock on a livestream.

So What Triggered This Flashpoint?

While tensions have been simmering for months — from Labour’s flip-flop on key manifesto pledges to controversial disciplinary actions against left-wing MPs — today’s protest appears to have been sparked by two major flashpoints:

Starmer’s refusal to back a full ceasefire in Gaza, even as other global leaders shift toward that position.
The Labour leadership’s crackdown on pro-Palestinian voices within its own party, including the recent suspension of MP Apsana Begum.

Combined, these decisions have created a narrative of betrayal that is now echoing far beyond activist circles — and into Labour’s traditional base.

The Fallout Has Already Begun

Within hours of the protest, #StarmerOut began trending on X (formerly Twitter), with over 380,000 posts by 6 PM. A Change.org petition demanding his resignation reached 65,000 signatures in under 12 hours.

Political analysts say Starmer may have underestimated just how deeply resentment toward his leadership runs.

“He thought purging the left would give him stability. But what he’s got is a movement turning on itself — and it’s ugly,” said Dr. Rani Dhir, political analyst at Queen Mary University.

What Comes Next?

As the dust settles on Whitehall, one thing is clear: today’s protest wasn’t an isolated outburst — it was the culmination of months of anger, betrayal, and political miscalculation.

Keir Starmer may have walked through the fire this afternoon, but he may not escape the burn in the months ahead.

Will Labour try to spin this as a vocal minority? Or is this the beginning of a full-scale revolt from the base that once fought to put them in power?

Either way, the storm is no longer coming.

The Betrayal is Complete” – Why They’re Calling Keir Starmer a Traitor

“First he turned on Corbyn. Then he turned on Palestine. Now he’s turned on the people.”
— Former Labour campaigner, outside Downing Street protest

A Political Earthquake Years in the Making

The fury that exploded outside Downing Street didn’t come out of nowhere. It wasn’t about a single speech, or a single vote in Parliament. It was the culmination of a slow-burning political betrayal, say critics — a story of broken promises, internal purges, and a party many no longer recognise.

Keir Starmer was supposed to unite Labour. Instead, he’s divided it deeper than ever before.

For many lifelong Labour voters and members, Starmer’s leadership represents not just a shift — but a betrayal of core principles. Words like “traitor” don’t get shouted lightly. But for thousands who turned up in rage this week, that word captures how they feel: betrayed by a man who once promised to represent them.

Let’s unpack how Starmer went from “steady statesman” to “political pariah” among huge swathes of the left.

The Gaza Crisis: The Red Line He Crossed

It’s the flashpoint issue that transformed frustration into fury.

When the Israel-Gaza war reignited in 2023, much of the world watched in horror. But in the UK, especially among Labour’s traditionally progressive and multi-ethnic base, Keir Starmer’s initial refusal to call for a ceasefire was seen as unforgivable.

In an interview on LBC in October 2023, Starmer said Israel “has the right to withhold power and water” from Gaza — a comment that triggered mass resignations from Labour councillors, especially in Muslim-majority areas.

Despite later walking back the remarks and clarifying that humanitarian aid was necessary, the damage was done. His subsequent refusal to explicitly back a permanent ceasefire, even as Labour MPs and mayors broke ranks to do so, only deepened the backlash.

Across the country, Labour councillors resigned en masse:

Over 70 councillors quit the party over Gaza within two months.
Major Labour-controlled councils — from Burnley to Oxford — reported internal rebellions.
Prominent figures, including Labour’s own shadow ministers, defied the whip to vote for a ceasefire.

But Starmer stood firm, insisting his position was one of “balance and realism.”

To his critics, it was cowardice, complicity, or worse — calculated betrayal.

The Purge of the Left

If Gaza was the spark, the broader war against the Labour Left has been the kindling — a long campaign of expulsions, suspensions, and silencing under Starmer’s leadership.

Let’s go back to 2020.

When Starmer stood for Labour leader, he promised to “unite the party”, build on Jeremy Corbyn’s radical legacy, and protect the 10 pledges he campaigned on.

Instead, within 18 months:

Jeremy Corbyn was suspended, then barred from standing as a Labour MP — a move many saw as a “political assassination” of the former leader.
Left-wing MPs like Diane Abbott and Apsana Begum faced public discipline or suspensions.
Thousands of grassroots activists were expelled, including Jewish socialists who criticised Israel.
Popular internal groups like Momentum and Jewish Voice for Labour were sidelined and purged.

To the wider public, these might seem like internal party squabbles. But to Labour’s base, it looked like this:

A hostile takeover. The soul of the party, ripped out.

Veteran trade unionist Len McCluskey called it “a Stalinist witch hunt.” Former Labour MP Chris Williamson called it “a brutal betrayal of socialist values.”

Even centrists began to worry. Former deputy leader Tom Watson said the atmosphere inside Labour was becoming “toxic from the top down.”

The Cost of ‘Professionalism’

Starmer’s defenders argue the crackdown was necessary to make Labour “electable” again — to look “professional,” “sensible,” “government-ready.”

But at what cost?

Under Corbyn, Labour became the largest political party in Europe, with nearly 600,000 members, many young, working class, and energised.

Under Starmer, membership has fallen below 400,000, with thousands quitting in protest. Party finances have worsened. Donations from grassroots members have been replaced by corporate backers and lobbyists.

For many, it confirms the narrative:

“Starmer’s Labour is no longer a movement. It’s a brand — one owned by lobbyists, not members.”

Broken Promises: The Abandoned “10 Pledges”

When Starmer ran for Labour leader in 2020, he published a document called “10 Pledges to Maintain Our Radical Values.” These were his contract with the left — promises to uphold Corbyn-era policies.

Here are just a few of those pledges — and how they’ve fared:

Pledge	Status	Details
Support public ownership of rail, mail, energy	❌ Abandoned	Now says nationalisation is “not a priority”
Abolish tuition fees	❌ Abandoned	Announced u-turn in 2023
End outsourcing in NHS	⚠️ Diluted	Now talks about “efficiency,” not reversal
Defend free movement of people	❌ Abandoned	Supports strict border controls
Common ownership of key industries	❌ Dropped	No mention in recent manifestos

This isn’t just “moving to the centre.” It’s a total policy reversal, say former allies.

“He lied to win the leadership, plain and simple,” said former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell. “He used our values, then threw them away.”

Many Labour activists now call Starmer the “Blair 2.0” — but without Blair’s charisma, or clear ideology.

The Working-Class Revolt

The final — and perhaps most dangerous — fracture is among Labour’s traditional working-class voters, especially in the North and Midlands.

These were the communities Labour was built to serve. And under Corbyn, despite his flaws, they felt seen again.

Under Starmer? Many feel abandoned, ignored, and disrespected.

Polling in 2024 shows:

32% of working-class voters now view Labour as “out of touch.”
In “Red Wall” seats, Labour’s lead over the Tories has narrowed to single digits.
Reform UK (Nigel Farage’s new party) is now polling over 15% nationally, pulling support from both disillusioned Tories and ex-Labour voters.

One factory worker in Wigan put it bluntly:

“Starmer talks like a lawyer, not a leader. He doesn’t get us. He doesn’t even try.”

Even with the Tories collapsing under the weight of 14 years in power, Labour’s path to victory is not guaranteed — not if its base stays home, or worse, turns elsewhere.

The Corporate Labour Party

Perhaps the most damning transformation under Starmer has been who the party now serves.

In just three years, Labour has taken millions in donations from property developers, private healthcare consultants, hedge fund managers, and bankers.

Starmer’s closest adviser, Peter Mandelson, has deep ties to lobbying firms.
Labour’s conference has been flooded with corporate sponsorships, private equity booths, and “VIP donor dinners.”
Critics say policy is now shaped by “focus groups and fundraisers” — not members or voters.

“He’s not just betrayed the left. He’s betrayed democracy in the party,” said Labour councillor Shaista Aziz, who resigned over Gaza and called Labour “a hollowed-out vehicle for elite interests.”

Psychological Shift: From Hope to Hostility

To understand the depth of anger, you have to understand what people thought Starmer was — and what they now believe he is.

In 2020, he sold himself as the calm, competent lawyer who could preserve Labour’s soul while making it electable.

In 2025, many now see him as:

A corporate suit in red rosettes
A pawn of Westminster groupthink
A man who says nothing, promises less, and stands for no one

Where Corbyn was seen as too radical, Starmer is seen as too hollow.

And hollow leaders don’t inspire — they manage. They survive. But they rarely lead revolutions.

Why “Traitor” Stings So Hard

It’s one thing to be unpopular. It’s another to be seen as a traitor — to your values, your movement, your members.

That’s the accusation now burning across banners, shouted in protest, and trending online.

To many voters, Starmer hasn’t just changed course.

He’s changed sides.

Can He Recover?

Starmer’s allies insist he’s playing a long game — appealing to swing voters, presenting a “serious government-in-waiting,” and avoiding “populist traps.”

But the danger is this: you can’t win an election with swing voters alone. You still need your base. And Labour’s base is fracturing fast.

Unless Starmer finds a way to reconnect with the people he once promised to represent, the word “traitor” won’t just haunt him in protests.

It might define his entire legacy.

Public & Media Reaction – The Fallout Hits Hard

Sky News ran the footage on repeat: Keir Starmer walking past a wall of sound—“Traitor! Traitor!”—without so much as a glance at the protesters. Within minutes, the video had gone viral. The framing across media outlets was immediate and brutal.

The Daily Mail splashed it across their homepage with the headline: “Keir the Coward: Labour Leader Walks Through Fury as Crowd Erupts.” The Telegraph followed suit, calling it a “Day of Reckoning” and questioning whether Starmer was “man enough to handle real opposition.” The Guardian, notably more restrained, framed the protest as a “reflection of public anger over Labour’s Gaza stance,” but even there, criticism of Starmer’s silence was unavoidable.

Social media exploded. On X (formerly Twitter), #StarmerOut and #LabourTraitor trended simultaneously, each amassing over 500,000 tweets within 24 hours. TikTok was flooded with clips of the protest, overlaid with commentary accusing Starmer of betrayal, cowardice, and opportunism. Instagram reels and YouTube shorts racked up millions of views showing protesters confronting police and chanting “No ceasefire, no vote!”

Political commentators moved fast. Owen Jones, never one to pull punches, released a live breakdown within hours. “This is what happens when you lie to win power,” he said. “Starmer is not just out of touch. He’s toxic to the very base Labour needs to win.” Novara Media echoed the sentiment, calling the protest “the breaking point in a relationship already dead.”

Right-wing media didn’t hold back either. GB News hosted a panel discussing “the Labour betrayal” with Reform UK spokespeople, Farage supporters, and former Labour voters who all agreed on one thing: Starmer is finished as a leader with credibility.

Even centrist commentators couldn’t ignore it. Sam Coates of Sky News asked on-air, “Has Starmer become so risk-averse that he’s now seen as morally evasive?” The BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg admitted that while Labour still holds a lead in the polls, “the internal corrosion is no longer theoretical—it’s erupting in the streets.”

Labour MPs were split. Those from the party’s left flank spoke out quickly. Zarah Sultana posted, “Our leadership must listen. This anger is real. These are our voters.” John McDonnell called the protest “a symptom of a leadership failing to connect with its moral base.” Meanwhile, centrists kept quiet. Wes Streeting posted a vague comment about “difficult days and leadership,” while Rachel Reeves refused to comment when pressed outside the Treasury briefing.

Some attempted damage control. Lisa Nandy appeared on Channel 4, saying the party “understands the pain in communities and remains committed to listening.” But she was immediately hit with questions about why so many Muslim and left-wing councillors are quitting. She dodged.

The silence from Starmer himself was louder than any speech. Not a single personal statement. No video. No post. Just a brief press release from a party spokesperson that was widely mocked online. “A man called a traitor by thousands of his own voters can’t even look them in the eye,” read one viral reply.

Petitions began circulating. One demanding Starmer’s resignation passed 100,000 signatures by the following evening. Another demanding Labour reverse its Gaza position surged past 250,000. Activists announced a “Starmer Must Go” campaign tour across major cities, backed by former Labour youth leaders and ex-party organisers. Trade union figures from UNITE and the CWU warned privately that unless the leadership changes tone, “they’ll lose more than just the streets—they’ll lose the ground game.”

Polling data began shifting. A Survation flash poll conducted the day after the protest found 43% of voters viewed Starmer as “dishonest.” Among Muslim voters, the number jumped to 71%. Among 18-24-year-olds, Labour’s lead dropped 11 points. Reform UK saw a 4-point bump.

Watch on YouTube

Crucially, focus groups in Red Wall areas revealed another pattern: apathy. Voters who supported Labour in 2017 and sat out 2019 said they were “done” with politics altogether. “They’re all liars,” said one ex-voter in Doncaster. “Starmer talks posh and does nowt.”

The SNP capitalised immediately. In Parliament, Stephen Flynn said, “If Labour can’t stand up for justice abroad, how can we trust them to stand up for Scots at home?” Plaid Cymru echoed the attack, saying Labour had “abandoned its moral compass.” Even Liberal Democrats joined in, branding Starmer “silent when it mattered.”

International media noticed. Al Jazeera broadcasted the protest live with the chyron: “UK Opposition Leader Faces Mass Backlash Over Gaza Silence.” The New York Times ran a story headlined “British Labour Leader Faces Revolt From Within.” In Turkey, India, and Malaysia, local news used the protest as an example of political hypocrisy in the West.

Behind the scenes, Labour aides were panicking. One leaked memo warned that “online sentiment is collapsing in core communities” and advised “urgent narrative reset.” Suggestions included visiting a mosque, meeting community leaders, or issuing a limited apology. So far, none have been acted upon.

Some insiders blamed the left for “organising chaos.” Others blamed Momentum and pro-Corbyn groups. But the reality, according to insiders, is that this wasn’t centrally organised. The protest grew organically through WhatsApp chains, community groups, and local activists. “It’s not just the left anymore,” said one Labour staffer. “It’s everyone he’s ignored.”

Meanwhile, opposition parties circled. Nigel Farage, seizing the opportunity, posted: “Labour are traitors to Britain and traitors to democracy. The people are rising.” Reform UK surged on Facebook with targeted ads in Muslim-heavy constituencies and Red Wall areas. The Tories, despite their own crumbling support, began crafting attack lines painting Labour as “morally bankrupt and politically lost.”

One former Labour strategist summed it up: “Starmer tried to control the narrative by suppressing dissent. But when you silence your base, they don’t disappear. They wait. And they explode. What we saw outside Downing Street was the consequence of years of top-down management colliding with bottom-up fury.”

Labour’s next challenge: conference season. Sources confirm protest groups are planning major disruptions, walkouts, and even parallel “People’s Conferences” in key cities. Local Labour parties in Birmingham, Tower Hamlets, and Manchester are already debating motions of no confidence in Starmer’s leadership.

None of this looks temporary. This isn’t a one-day protest. It’s a sign of something deeper—a revolt that’s just getting started. And Starmer’s refusal to address it directly is only making it worse.

Unless Labour’s leadership makes a dramatic change in tone, policy, or personnel, the party risks entering the general election not as a united force—but as a hollowed-out shell of what it once was, carried by inertia and crushed by its own contradictions.

The public has spoken, the media has turned, and the base is in open revolt. Starmer may have walked through the storm, but the flood that follows could drown his entire project.

1 MIN AGO: Keir Starmer CONFRONTS Uproar as Protesters Yell ‘TRAITOR’ Outside Dowing Street!